Posts Tagged 'government-managed health care'
JUST IN! HB6075: A necessary step to regulate abortion coverage under national healthcare if the Cox lawsuit is not successful
Published April 26, 2010 Uncategorized Leave a CommentTags: abortion, AG lawsuit, apackof2, current events, government-managed health care, HB 6075, michigan, Mike Cox, Obama Care, Opsommer, progressives, regulate abortion coverage, Rep. Paul Opsommer, socialized medicine, tea party
AFTER ACTION REPORT: Tea Party Express Michigan
Published April 12, 2010 Uncategorized 2 CommentsTags: apackof2, Capitol, current events, deem and pass, government-managed health care, grassroots in michigan, health care, insurance, lansing, Liberals, Obama Care, progressives, socialized medicine, Stupak, tea party, tea party express
You’ll have to excuse my brevity here but I am still recovering from a whirlwind and demanding tour schedule as a guest speaker for the Michigan leg of the Tea Party Express. Ten cities and over 500 miles in 4 days! Great turnout in all cities and Bart Stupak resigns…Perfect
Well every picture tells a story doesn’t it? So I’ll let the pictures do that PHOTO ALBUM OF TEA PARTY EXPRESS MICHIGAN TOUR
Just a few pictures of the many uploaded to the album…
Traverse City, MI
Grand Rapids, MI
State Capitol, Lansing, MI
Timeline of Major Provisions in the Democrats
Published March 26, 2010 Uncategorized Leave a CommentTags: current events, death panels, government-managed health care, health care, Health Care Reform, HR 3590, Obama Care, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, progressives, socialized medicine, tea party, timeline of provisions, trillion dollar debt, what is in the bill
So this is what change looks like…
Published March 23, 2010 Uncategorized Leave a CommentTags: current events, government-managed health care, grassroots in michigan, health care, hope and change, House rep, mcotter, michigan, Obama Care, Pelosi, progressives, protest, tea party, traitors, video
EXPEL SLAUGHTER!
Published March 17, 2010 Uncategorized 1 CommentTags: abuse of power, chairmen of the rules committee, constitution, current events, deem, deem the bill, Democrat Louise Slaughte, expel slaughter, government-managed health care, HR3590, mark levin, New York Democrat, Obama Care, Pelosi, politics, progressives, ramming the bill, Senate bill, slaughter, tea party, torch and pitchfork, up-or-down vote
CONTACT YOUR MICHIGAN HOUSE REP ASK THEM TO START EXPULSION OF SLAUGHTER ACCORDING TO Article 1, Section 7 of the Constitution says that in order for a “Bill” to “become a Law,” it “shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y
We’re not sure American schools teach civics any more, but once upon a time they taught that under the U.S. Constitution a bill had to pass both the House and Senate to become law. Until this week, that is, when Speaker Nancy Pelosi is moving to merely “deem” that the House has passed the Senate health-care bill and then send it to President Obama to sign anyway.
Under the “reconciliation” process that began yesterday afternoon, the House is supposed to approve the Senate’s Christmas Eve bill and then use “sidecar” amendments to fix the things it doesn’t like. Those amendments would then go to the Senate under rules that would let Democrats pass them while avoiding the ordinary 60-vote threshold for passing major legislation. This alone is an abuse of traditional Senate process.
But Mrs. Pelosi & Co. fear they lack the votes in the House to pass an identical Senate bill, even with the promise of these reconciliation fixes. House Members hate the thought of going on record voting for the Cornhusker kickback and other special-interest bribes that were added to get this mess through the Senate, as well as the new tax on high-cost insurance plans that Big Labor hates.
So at the Speaker’s command, New York Democrat Louise Slaughter, who chairs the House Rules Committee, may insert what’s known as a “self-executing rule,” also known as a “hereby rule.” Under this amazing procedural ruse, the House would then vote only once on the reconciliation corrections, but not on the underlying Senate bill. If those reconciliation corrections pass, the self-executing rule would say that the Senate bill is presumptively approved by the House—even without a formal up-or-down vote on the actual words of the Senate bill.
Democrats would thus send the Senate bill to President Obama for his signature even as they claimed to oppose the same Senate bill. They would be declaring themselves to be for and against the Senate bill in the same vote. Even John Kerry never went that far with his Iraq war machinations. As we went to press, the precise mechanics that Democrats will use remained unclear, though yesterday Mrs. Pelosi endorsed this “deem and pass” strategy in a meeting with left-wing bloggers.
This two-votes-in-one gambit is a brazen affront to the plain language of the Constitution, which is intended to require democratic accountability. Article 1, Section 7 of the Constitution says that in order for a “Bill” to “become a Law,” it “shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate.” This is why the House and Senate typically have a conference committee to work out differences in what each body passes. While sometimes one house cedes entirely to another, the expectation is that its Members must re-vote on the exact language of the other body’s bill.
As Stanford law professor Michael McConnell pointed out in these pages yesterday, “The Slaughter solution attempts to allow the House to pass the Senate bill, plus a bill amending it, with a single vote. The senators would then vote only on the amendatory bill. But this means that no single bill will have passed both houses in the same form.” If Congress can now decide that the House can vote for one bill and the Senate can vote for another, and the final result can be some arbitrary hybrid, then we have abandoned one of Madison’s core checks and balances.
Yes, self-executing rules have been used in the past, but as the Congressional Research Service put it in a 2006 paper, “Originally, this type of rule was used to expedite House action in disposing of Senate amendments to House-passed bills.” They’ve also been used for amendments such as to a 1998 bill that “would have permitted the CIA to offer employees an early-out retirement program”—but never before to elide a vote on the entire fundamental legislation.
We have entered a political wonderland, where the rules are whatever Democrats say they are. Mrs. Pelosi and the White House are resorting to these abuses because their bill is so unpopular that a majority even of their own party doesn’t want to vote for it. Fence-sitting Members are being threatened with primary challengers, a withdrawal of union support and of course ostracism. Michigan’s Bart Stupak is being pounded nightly by MSNBC for the high crime of refusing to vote for a bill that he believes will subsidize insurance for abortions.
Democrats are, literally, consuming their own majority for the sake of imposing new taxes, regulations and entitlements that the public has roundly rejected but that they believe will be the crowning achievement of the welfare state. They are also leaving behind a procedural bloody trail that will fuel public fury and make such a vast change of law seem illegitimate to millions of Americans.
The concoction has become so toxic that even Mrs. Pelosi isn’t bothering to defend the merits anymore, saying instead last week that “we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.” Or rather, “deeming” to have passed it.
Call for Nullification
Published January 3, 2010 Uncategorized Leave a CommentTags: 10 amendment, apackof2, Charles Key, constitution, current events, facism, freedom, government control, government-managed health care, grassroots in michigan, James Madison, michigan, nullification, Obama Care, politics, protest, sovernity, states rights, tea party, Thomas Jefferson
Nullification is a constitutional theory that gives an individual state the right to declare null and void any law passed by the United States Congress which the state deems unacceptable and unconstitutional. The concept is most well-known in the context of the sectionalist crisis that plagued the Union in the 40 years preceding the Civil War.
The origins of nullification are found in the Federalist-Republican debate of the late 1700s. James Madison and Thomas Jefferson in the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions (1798) declared that the states had the right to nullify laws by which the federal government overstepped its limits of jurisprudence.
Dems Refuse GOP Efforts to Strip Bribes From Health Care Bill
Published December 26, 2009 Uncategorized Leave a CommentTags: Ben Nelson, Carl Levin, Cornhusker kickback, current events, Debbie Stabenow, Democrats, earmarks, frontier states, government-managed health care, grassroots in michigan, health care, Liberals, Medicare, michigan, Mike Johanns, Montana, Nebraska, Obama Care, out of control spending, Pelosi, politics, progessives, Senate health care bill, smokey back room, socialized medicine, special deals, tea party, Wyoming
December 23, 2009 Jim Hoft
Senator Mike Johanns asked consent today to strike the special carve-outs from the Senate health care bill. Democrats immediately objected, thwarting the effort.
“There should be no special deals, no carve-outs for anyone in this health care bill; not for states, not for insurance companies, not for individual senators.
“All of the special deals should be removed. If the bill cannot pass without carve-outs, what further evidence is needed that it is bad policy? No senator should vote for the final cloture vote until all of the carve-outs and special deals are removed.
“Nebraskans don’t want a special deal, they want good policy. They don’t believe the Federal Government is the answer to every problem and they don’t like backroom deals.”
Below is a sample of special deals he offered to strike:
** Eliminating or reducing the Medicaid unfunded mandate on Nebraska, Vermont, and Massachusetts (starting on page 96, line 9) ** Exempting certain health insurance companies in Nebraska and Michigan from taxes and fees (starting on page 367, line 6) ** Providing automatic Medicare coverage for anyone living in Libby, Montana (starting on page 194 – section 10323) ** Earmarking $100 million for a “Health Care Facility” reportedly in Connecticut (starting on page 328) ** Giving special treatment to Hawaii’s Disproportionate Share Hospitals (starting on page 101, line 6) ** Boosting reimbursement rates for certain hospitals in Michigan and Connecticut (starting on page 174 – section 10317) ** Mandating special treatment for hospitals in “Frontier” States like Montana, South Dakota, North Dakota, and Wyoming (starting on page 208 — Sec 10324)…Excerpt..Read More at
Send a Christmas Greeeting to our “dear leaders!”
Published December 2, 2009 Uncategorized Leave a CommentTags: apackof2, christmas, current events, government-managed health care, health care, Merry Christmas, national debt, Obama Care, out of control spending, Pelosi, politics, postcard, protest, republic, Senate, socialized medicine, tea party
My intent is to provide projects of “armchair activism” that can be done from home yet still send the message to our Representatives that we will not give up until the ObamaCare Bill is killed. This abomination of government control is a nail in the coffin of our Constitutional personal liberties and in fact our very Republic.
…Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty towards the majesty of heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings…. Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death! Patrick Henry – March 23, 1775
“Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.” Thomas Jefferson
Send a Christmas Greeting to our “dear leaders”!
Front and back of postcards (& list of Senators) can be printed off from this site OR you can download both
Directions:
Click print, you MUST USE LANDSCAPE setting in your printer when you print both the front and back
I also used the “Fast” color setting in my printer to save on colored ink and the front graphic turned out fine
After printing out front of postcard, place GRAPHIC SIDE UP back in paper tray and print out the back of card DON’T FORGET TO CHOOSE LANDSCAPE OPTION in your printer settings
Cut on lines for 4 postcards, address to our “dear leaders (printable addresses for President Obama & senators by state below) sign your name, if you do not wish to use your Street address, please consider your state and zip code to legitimatize your postcard as from a private citizen instead of a Astroturf-type organization
Slap a stamp on ( this is an oversize postcard and only needs postcard postage) and your ready to mail your Christmas “greeting” to our “dear leaders!” Merry Christmas!
Text on postcard back: “I already have a Savior and its not the government. And I do not want “ObamaCare” under my Christmas tree!
Senators by State
Three not to miss!
President Barack H. Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylviania Ave NW
Washington D.C. 20500
Speaker Nancy Pelosi
235 Cannon HOB
Washington D.C. 20515
Sen. Harry Reid
522 Hart Senate Office Building
Washinton D.C. 20510


